ARTICLES
Read dozens of articles that are of interest to amusement attraction participants, operators, manufacturers, engineers, expert witnesses and owners.Motivate.
Illuminate.
Transform.
A federal court lets a foam-pit spine-injury case go forward and keeps ASTM F2970 in play for punitive damages
New Jersey’s highest court will weigh counsel disqualification tied to expert retention in Sky Zone trampoline-park injury litigation
When CCTV Contradicts the Pleadings: What a Recent Trampoline-Park Dismissal Reminds Counsel About Evidence and ASTM F2970
A serious leg fracture at an indoor trampoline park — and why the file still turns on contemporaneous evidence, the pleaded theory, and the right standard In September 2026, Ireland’s High Court dismissed a personal-injuries claim arising from a serious...
Indoor Playground Injuries Are Not Trampoline-Park Cases: Why ASTM F1918 Is Usually the Standard That Actually Applies
Indoor Playground Injuries Are Not Trampoline-Park Cases Why ASTM F1918 is usually the standard that actually applies When a child is injured in a padded, enclosed play structure at a family entertainment center, mall play area, or indoor playground, the file often...
Can a Liability Waiver Defeat an Amusement Injury Lawsuit? Why the Answer Is Often More Complicated Than the Waiver Suggests
What Are Zipline Injury Cases Worth? A Review of Reported Verdicts and Settlements
When Can a Zipline Accident Support Punitive Damages? A Look at Texas Law
Why Attorneys Handling Trampoline Park and Zipline Injury Cases Turn to MIT Experts
